Quantcast Royal Purple
College Media Network

And the award goes to ... Horror movie remakes

Paul Bremer

Issue date: 2/6/08 Section: Web Extras
  • Print
  • Email
Bremer
Bremer
[Click to enlarge]
If I were a psychologist, I could really break down the concept of fear into some complex analysis of human nature and mental stimuli. But alas, I am no expert on matters of the mind, so I'll simplify fear to this: people either like to be scared or they don't. Look at that, a layman's explanation free of charge.

Many of us, me included, love the blood-pumping, adrenaline-induced high of fear so much that we're willing to pay for it. I suppose it would be more economical just to wane dangerously close to the edge of a cliff than to leave a theater with an empty wallet and sticky shoes. But then again, I don't know where I could find a good tub of buttered popcorn hundreds of feet above sea level.

I've made one or two, or 486, trips to the theater throughout the years and admittedly the majority of the films I see are from the horror genre. What can I say? I'm a creature of habit and not too concerned with variety. It's probably just as well, considering horror movies are lacking in that department, as well as in creative vision. Lately, fresh ideas have run so dry that studios now rely heavily on the re-imagining of told stories in the form of remakes.

New Line Cinema recently announced they are in negotiations to resurrect the "Nightmare on Elm Street" franchise. The original 1983 film, directed by Wes Craven, has become a cult horror classic and has spawned numerous sequels.

There's no doubt audiences are ready for the return of Freddy Krueger with his fedora cap and striped sweater. Isn't it such a cheap shot to cash in on someone else's idea though? The original stands the test of time to this day; horrifyingly gruesome but with a truly frightening psychological element; the idea of sleep as a portal for evil; brilliant.

So why touch something that is so amazing and needs no further interpretation? I believe in giving all films a fair shot but have been disappointed time and time again, most recently with last year's remake of "Halloween." The 1978 version is the epitome of terror for me. "Halloween" is a film that preys on the fear of being watched and delivered the scares with absolutely no use of blood or graphic violence.
Page 1 of 2 next >

Article Tools

Viewing Comments 1 - 1 of 1

Kendra

posted 2/05/08 @ 9:16 PM CST

Its the same sort of thing with the SAW movies. they aren't really horror; they're more thriller than anything else. There's little suspense, nothing is left to the imagination, and its shocking images and sounds that trigger the senses than the imagination. (Continued…)

Post a Comment

  • NOTE: Email address will not be published

Type your comment below (html not allowed)

  I understand posting spam or other comments that are unrelated to this article will cause my comment to be flagged for deletion and possibly cause my IP address to be permanently banned from this server.

Advertisement

Poll

What is the best part of fall?
Submit Vote

View Results

Advertisement

Sections

Options

Links